
'Digital Me' is turning human capability into corporate assets. HR must push back
April 27, 2026
John Brazier

Is yours an ‘employee-centric’ organization? Current trends are making this approach a strategic business necessity, emphasizing employee’s views and expectations as well as the bottom line.
Traditionally, HR is on the front-line championing employee interests in ways that contribute to the success of the business. We argue here that the nature of this support has to change.
In particular, HR policy and practice now has to be much more closely aligned with the needs and expectations of individual employees. In other words, HR has to get personal.
The employee-centric organization treats employees as key stakeholders, and as a valuable resource. Priorities include a supportive working environment, with open communications, where employees feel valued and empowered, with good working conditions and work-life balance, and access to training and development.
The role of HR as business partner involves creating and maintaining those conditions, while meeting the staffing needs of the business.
With roots in last century’s quality of working life movement, and the more recent concept of job quality or ‘good work’, this has been accepted HR wisdom with regard to employee motivation for some time.
However, it seems that some organizations, faced with harsh economic pressures, have not implemented these ideas, pursuing a narrow, bottom-line approach that risks generating long-term resentment and ultimately damage to the business.
One practice from the noughties that has not attracted recent attention is i-deals - personally negotiated arrangements that differ from those of colleagues.
I-deals can cover pay, benefits, flexible hours, and development opportunities. This approach is usually limited to ‘superstars’ with the power to negotiate special packages for themselves.
Given current trends and the pace of change, we should be thinking about making i-deals available to all.
Five current trends suggest a fundamental rethink of HR policy, with a renewed focus on individual employee needs and expectations:
In addition, companies are now being advised to provide mental health assistance, and to support staff facing the cost of living crisis. This is further encouragement for HR to tailor policy and practice to individuals rather than to the workforce as a whole.
A recent study of 128 major company change programs found that only 22% met their financial and reputational success criteria*. The successful companies had focused on employee needs in the following areas:
Citing the experience of Microsoft, PayPal, and Hershey, the researchers conclude that their success was due to the focus on the employee experience: teamwork, collaboration, culture, empowerment, compensation.
There are other examples, like Southwest Airlines (which invests in its workforce), Costco (which promotes teamwork and development), Unilever (which has an employee mental health program), and Admiral Insurance Group (which prioritizes inclusivity and staff engagement).
There is of course no one ‘correct’ approach here. Policies have to be tailored to particular business and workforce needs and circumstances.
Your chief exec or finance director will complain that: ‘This will increase costs’. But we have skill shortages and a tight labor market. Companies that don’t meet employee expectations will lose them to more accommodating competitors.
Nurses, for example, can find well paid, less stressful work in retail and hospitality.
Losing staff is expensive. How much does it cost your business to replace leavers in terms of recruitment, induction, training, and lost output while new hires get up to speed? When someone leaves, they take business knowledge with them; it is hard to put a price on that.
The marginal cost of individually tailored working arrangements may be much less than the long-term benefits from an engaged, empowered, motivated, and loyal workforce.
I-deals can be easier to adjust than collective agreements, increasing organizational agility in the face of rapid change. But problems can arise if some staff feel that colleagues have better deals than they have - creating a ‘them and us’ workforce. This approach has to be carefully managed, monitored, and adjusted to avoid these tensions.
The role of middle and front line management is critical in this regard, listening to concerns, ensuring that employees’ views are heard, respected, and acted on.
Training in leadership skills may thus also be required, particularly if this involves a shift from a traditional directive style to a more supportive one.
Will managing these changes significantly increase the HR workload? Not necessarily. Not everyone will take up what’s on offer.
Expect demand to come from staff with young families and/or caring responsibilities, and from older staff who may also have caring roles as well as personal health issues.
Demand will also depend on how employee-centric the organization is already.
Fortunately, technology support is also available to help with:
Here are eight steps to refocusing HR policy and practice on individual employee needs and expectations of work:
Keep a close eye on the social and economic trends that affect your organization.
Assess the implications for employee needs and expectations of work.
Update your HR policies and practices accordingly. Personalization may be the start of a revolution at work - and for HR.
Where the HR world meets. Don’t miss out on UNLEASH World in Paris this October.